The Journal
Serving the Metropolitan Area
Since 1872
February 2nd
TOO MANY PEOPLE!
By Jack Parnell - retired Congressman and Independent Presidential
candidate
Syndicated
by Acme Features
“That which
is common to the greatest number has the least care bestowed on it.”
- Aristotle
This ol’ gray and
gassy planet’s passed another milestone a while back… and plague be damned...
it now houses eight billion of us. Eight billion!
And change.
If there's a common environmental
root to Entropy's many noxious weeds, it's the ancient problem of unrestrained
population growth. When Mancunian textile wages plummeted in the calamitous
decade following the American and French Revolutions (during which emigration of
labor's surplus was sharply curtailed), Mr. Adam Smith, beholding a vista of desperate,
starving and riled-up proletariati, remarked: "The
minds of men are contracted and rendered incapable of elevation, education is
despised or, at most, neglected, and the heroic spirit is almost utterly
extinguished."
And crowned heads started
rolling.
Smith's
contemporary, Thomas Malthus, espoused that Christian principle (as also,
although he would have cringed at the prospect, was and remains encountered
among certain other Asiatic faiths) equating life with suffering; suffering
pleases God, so those who ratchet up body counts by war or plague or famine or
dealing bad fentanyl or kicking dogs, do Godly work.
Upon themselves or others - no difference! – and it is more
felicitous to inflict suffering than suffer oneself, just like the root flaw of
Communism was and remains that Dictators of the Proletariat turn out to prefer
being dictators to proletarians and eventually turn to… well… dictatorial
measures to prevent the sort of deadly competition as results. Them as limit the extent of the suffering do
Satan's work. Tommy Malt advocated lower classes be forcibly made celibate,
like certain Chinese of the day, or like feral cats of our own; "peaceable
and orderly... less inclined to tumultuous proceedings in seasons of
scarcity... less influenced by inflammatory and seditious publications..."
and wasn’t thought a danger to reproductive or civil rights because there were no
such rights back then. In fact, Tommy Malt exceeded even present
biotech dystopianism by advocating that minds, as
well as genitals, be altered or abolished; perhaps by lasers or nanoparticles
as will eventually solve that thinking
problem. Swallow that, Info Wars! England's high mucky-mucks...
having just lost their American colonies and resenting the cost of
transport to Australia for all but the most persistent problem people, not to
mention seeing the French aristocracy losing its heads over too much
democracy... found Malthus a fine, useful fellow. They bought enough of his
books so... with his pay as propagandist for the East India Tea people (that
Tea Party progenitor being a sort of early spin doctor)... he was able to raise
up and feed his own family of three kids (as defenders say) or up to eleven
(according to his enemies who, then as now, hastened to employ the politics of
personal scandal to attack his ideas).
Fortunately for Britain...
as also Germany and Italy, Ireland, France, Spain and Russia, among other
nations... the Louisiana Purchase happened and America would soon again absorb
their Eurosurplus plus a few handy-dandy Africans and
the occasional Chinee. But that frontier is
populated, now... fields enclosed, rents skyrocketing, water rationed during those
endemic (trending towards pandemic) West Coast droughts, and the cities of the
plain teem with men as cry for work and bread where there is none. Complicating the situation is the drift into
idleness of working
We don't have an America
to ship our undeserving poor off to... we are America.
Stability in population
is a precondition of prosperity, which is a precondition for democracy. James
Madison, a defender of democracy in the Athenian sense... that it be extended
only to rich, white male citizens... thought population growth dangerous at a
time when we had less than a tenth as many people as we do now. "An increase
of population will, of necessity," predicted li'l
Jemmy, "increase the proportion of those who will
labour under all the hardships of life and secretly
sigh for a more equal distribution of its blessings."
Them sighs ain't so secret anymore... and are apt to be followed by singing
bullets in such places as are less and less burdened by identification principality
as more and more surplus Americans realize that their once (and probably
future) President has played them for fools and the guy who replaced him has a
lot of aspirations, but somewhere less inspiration. On other hand, the pivot as has occurred since
2016 from a class war to a race war will engender problems of its own.
Former maquila zones along the Mexican side of the Rio Grande, which
tasted just enough prosperity before runaway Amerijobs
re-migrated to China, have sunk into lawlessness bad as some parts of Honduras (or
Chicago) - narcoterrorists gunning it out over control
of the lucrative arthritis, blood pressure medicine and egg smuggling trade.
India and Pakistan's population war (as usually precedes shootin'
war), Chancellor Jofl's expulsion of Muslims out of
Austria, them food wars over most of Africa and Mr. Tillerman's
folks as privately patrol both borders...
there being this dispute about those two weedy Quebecoís crucified to
maples in Maine... all augur a certain, well... discontent?
Ukraine? North Korea? Let’s not go there, not just yet...
Clean air, water and...
as some believe... clean genepools are birthrights for which Americans fought a
war of independence, cleared the continent from sea to shining sea and... well, you get that picture too. "Most people are not
qualified to have children," said that late "monkeywrencher"
of the Ubergreen persuasion, Edward Abbey, following
Mr. Aristotle's premise that "Equality consists in the same treatment of similar
persons," as ranks up there in present-day pre-MAGA Teabag Party relevance
(its conspiracy zone population, of course, excepted) with the Tragedy of the
Commons.
Tho',
as columnist Myriam Marquez had a lack of political correctness
to observe: "if we don't want people coming here illegally, then we have
to be willing to pay Americans more for back-breaking work that desperate
immigrants are willing to do."
Or lock them up and
then make them “arbeit
mach frei”. It might be that the problem isn’t the population
surplus, it’s the deficit of smart people as can do things like write the code
that robots (who never need to urinate!) use to sort packages for Amazon and
the Fed Express (or fix plumbing fixtures). Do we have to wait until those clever robotics
people… mostly in Japan where a sudden population drop has left a shortage of
minimum and subminimum wage caretakers for the elderly and young folk as to
carry on the breed… ride to our rescue? That they’ve also been developing sex robots
(think of the Austin Powers movie) isn’t helping either. Maybe we could ship a few shiploads of those
critters over to Pakistan or Zimbabwe to cool the testeronian
passions of the dictators there once the prices go down – or to Mad Vlad Putin
or, even, to Mister Trump if his marital problems persist!
Clearly there's a need
for hard decisions as to whose lives need
be preserved, for how long, and at what cost. We might handle our old folks'
problem and solve Mexico's awhile... ship aging Americans off to Baja to roast
on beach chairs in brightly-colored Depends while their social security checks get
deposited directly into Mexican banks. And, after a particularly vitriolic
round of voting on the partial-birth, back in the day, I proposed a cheap deal:
toss any pregger as third-trimester aborts (raped, incested or health-menaced, and their li'l
doctors, too) under a jail, so long as Virtuecrats swallowed
simple "morning-after" contraceptives like the RU-486. I did so
knowing both sides were masterminded by fanatics, so chances for compromise on
the RU-486, not to mention that new pill from Switzerland for guys, was
nil – meanwhile, the rebirthers and their pals at
SCOTUS conquered the first and second trimester and are advancing on the
contraception while liberals do what they do best... cringe, cry and march
around in circles rattling their coathangers.
During my stint in Congress,
I also met an Egyptian with UN/New World Order strings and an un-Islamic
whiskey/cocaine problem as provoked him into unpleasant truthfulness now and
again. "Rome and Mecca will never consent even to the safest means of
contraception," he said, "for there has been only one means of population
control acceptable to God for the last fifteen centuries… and that is war. To
pretend otherwise would cause the man to lose his status as master of the
household, no matter which God he prayed to."
Then he said that the
problem is that women took control of their lives in parts of the world where
they shouldn't have been expected to have... and over the strenuous objections
of men, God and... especially... men of God. Pretty much all religion, I've
figured out... Patriarch Kirill to Jerry Falwell to the muzzahs in
Tehran... boils down to old, long-bearded, self-appointed holy lechers in dirty
robes and adult diapers wantin' all the ripe l’il cherries – daughters, neighbors, strangers, howsoever.
To keep' most of the young bucks out'n their orchard,
they have to develop causes to go to war, so the surplus can either lose and
die in the fighting, or win and get to rape the vanquished.
Meaning that, when all's
said and done, there remain only two solutions to the population crisis that
the President and next Congress will steer away from as they wrangle with
immigration... birth control or death decontrol. If, as Austin Tillerman
suggests, government ties the tubes of welfare queens… shouldn’t we also chop
the li’l jerries off Jerry
Sandusky or li’l bernies off’n Bernie Madoff? (Or Sanders?... the
MAWA-men might grunt and Elizabeth Warrens agree… but that’s a different story,
and for a different bedtime.)
Them rumblings as
are tumblin’ out’n the deep
Green State about just letting the Omega plague have its way or, in fact, even helpin’ it along some instead of killing it daid… well, as the day traders are proving, it only takes a
few nerd turds to blank out a power grid. Or an election. Or a species.
There is, of course,
the possibility of shooting the unwanted off into space viz. Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk and Richard Branson in their competition to colonize
Mars. But Mars is a cold and hostile
place, and the involuntary astronauts will probably want to be paid for their sufferings and risk. That’s what comes of letting women go
flouncing about with shootin’ irons, but without
veils.
"Put
simply," remarks Jeremy Rifkin, population futurwurster,
"does every member of society, even the poorest among us, have a right to participate
in and benefit from increases in productivity brought on by the information,
communications and technology revolutions?"
If not, cautions Judy
Goldsmith, former president of NOW: "These disadvantaged children will be
the caretakers of the world in which we spend our later years."
CLICK the CATFISH to go to
PAST and PRESENT EPISODES of "BLACK HELICOPTERS" and to OTHER JACK PARNELL COLUMNS |