The Journal
Serving the Metropolitan Area
Since 1872
August 17th
WHY NOT the BOTH?
By Jack Parnell - retired Congressman and Independent Presidential
candidate
Syndicated
by Acme Features
|
|
MMM"...and
then the kerosene Is brought down
from the castle M By insurance men
who go... MM Check see that
nobody’s escaping to Desolation row..." |
|
||
|
|
- Robert Zimmerman |
|
||
If you want a
society as furnishes illusions of the immortality... good!... but not at the
expense of more gumment... (bad
- except that as regulates those other people!)... best way of doing so's to hand life over to the life-insurance
companies.
Insurance people run
our lives! Big Data and our hopeless quest for immortality's allowed those
underwriters in the sky to nullify most everything as makes a life worth living
(save those vices already proscribed by the pee ceisters
and plague sisters, long after the necessity is gone) out of some fear someone might
fall down, scrape their knee and sue! Easter Seals programs for kids in the
wheelchairs! Kaput! Chinese New Year's parade in San Frisco, Mardi
Gras in New Orleans... going!... Saturnalia, long gone, too – long before the Covid
poked its long nose under Don Jones’ tent! Ice skating rinks, swimming pools,
mostly run off... even that artist whose paintings inspired projectile
vomiting, causing some "victim" to blow out an artery and sue the
gallery! Police and Good Samaritans bankrupted by relatives and lawyers of
suicides as jump off freeway overpasses stand by, now, and record the tragedy
on their phones for uploading to You Tube. Corporations packing boards with
rank incompetents, bankrupts and common crooks because intelligent and honest
people refuse exposure to the personal liability provisions liberals put in the
business laws of some states.
Don’t count on the courts
for help… their backlogs are up to five years, sometimes seven, now… with all
of the plague litigation, not to mention the soaring murder rates which, here
and there are causing promoters of getting folks together events to cancel out
due to the proliferation of active shooters. Some of it valid, some not. But neither political party will
let the insurance companies go out of business like the corner diner – they’re
too big to fail, like the banks (chuckle, chuckle!). They’ll just raise their rates.
"The best are the
first to go," acknowledged business insurance lawyer Lyle Sparks, the rest
park their net worth in the Caymans and such other places as also welcome drug
dealers and dictators. And we wonder why there's such criminalization of business
and corporatization of crime these days!
Our Insurance-Litigation
Complex has been round almost as long as some strains of the venereal disease;
credit Kaiser Bill in Germany for lifting it up, as an alternative to the
Communism, in the '80s or so... the 1880's. A previous President
snarfed up that Massachusetts Mormon’s scheme to lock up them as don't buy sufficient
insurance; Brother Tillerman accuses it of contributing to arson, malpractice,
fraud and, even, murder. Mr. Gilder merely considers it a liberal plot...
though I think liberals, especially the neo-variety, worse than
Commies... a "moral hazard" that depresses productivity and
desensitizes the economy to what ails it.
"Viewed as a substitute
for adequate public social welfare spending," this old JFK liberal, Lester
Thurow, contended, "private suits have a certain
logic, but unfortunately it is an inefficient logic."
Since frivolous malpractice
suits get settled because it's cheaper than litigating, insurers just hike
malpractice premiums on all doctors, good or bad. Gynecologists and cardiologists
seek better careers in mail-order nutritional supplements; their former
patients as can afford so go to Pakistanis or the Venezuelans in the strip
malls. The rest haunt emergency rooms of public hospitals, go on TV weeping and
rattlin' the charity can or, dada-run-out-o'-luck,
just die.
Now, to hear 'em scratch
and hiss at one another, one might almost believe the lawyers and insurers
mortal enemies... the reality is that they are equal participants in a complicated
dance, and the public is the floor their hooves tap-tap across. That Flo from that company is doin’ the nasty with your favorite daytime TV ambulance chaser,
while the Geico lizard’s pleasurin’ Tonya Harding in
a sort of mutual admiration society whereas the insurers blame greedy lawyers
in public and... where politically feasible... the civil justice system. Citing
a RAND study that found lawyers kept an average 63% of damages awarded in
asbestos-related cases, columnist Guy Wright blamed juries. "There are
many alienated people to whom serving on a jury in a damage suit is a chance to
hit the hated establishment in the pocketbook."
In one case... in
Alabama, the Mecca of outrageous judgments... an idjut
boy won nine hundred thousand dollars for the burns suffered by having stuck
his finger in an electric socket, and a rejected cheerleader candidate sued the
Vestavia Hills school for the "humiliation and anguish". As for
California... this is the state where an effin' burglar,
as fell through the roof of a school he was ripping off, sued and won...
another jury awarded some crybaby as claimed not to understand the warning on
cigarette packs twenty-eight billion dollars.
Even patriotic art gets
gummed up by the litigation. That old favorite... Washington crossing the Delaware...
took a hit from the decent citizens of Columbus, Georgia as sued to get it out
of textbooks when a bureaucrat alleged Georgie's bullocks were hanging out'n the stall! Then, some idjut
claimed it gave him the notion that standing up in boats was
safe, so, when his client fell overboard, it was the fault of the painter, Emanuel
Leutze... and since he was safely dead, the National Museum's deep (taxpayer)
pockets were ripe for the plucking!
But, speaking of culture
and the First Amendment, it's the insurance companies most responsible for
taking us back to 1984. Thanks to the poisoned Apples of dot-com technology (and
a little help from friends like the NSA), they know what we eat and drink, what
we read, what we think about in bed (if we've ever logged onto the Internet or
commiserated over the telephone or been red-light photosnapped
in the back of a taxi with a certain somebody), whether we've got AIDS or
Corona or itchy feet or chewed gum back in third grade. Since gumment made it a crime not to have the right automobile insurance,
we're complicit when insurers deny drivers based... not on their driving
records... but on credit and marital status, on frequency of job changes,
residence (meaning race) and membership in the right kind of church, astrological
sign or just whatever.
Those advertisements
for the company as installs spyware in the Subaru and doles out discounts to
“good” drivers who obey the speed limits even when Junior’s suffering explosive
diarrhea or bleeding out on the way to the hospital after being shot by some
malcontent… they’re not funny anymore. They’re our reality! Them devices forced on drivers by some
companies beep and send signals back to the corporation to raise rates when you
brake, but no penalty accrues if you just run the red light or run over the old
lady still in the crosswalk.
Then the slippery slope
began sliding right down through healthcare and towards those in the Congress
as advocate replacing all jobless compensation with admonitions that workers
buy private unemployment insurance policies with premiums determined by whatever
little nuggets of dero are provided them by the happy
gnomes of Larry Ellison and Peter Thiel’s Big Data and the data-mining minions
of the NSA. What could go wrong with
that?
"Insurers are dictating
people's lifestyles and acting as moral censors," concluded Insurance
Commissioner Tim Ryles of Georgia who, shortly after,
lost his job owing to insurers pouring millions into the campaign of a
born-again competitor, whose own abhorrence of sinful people behind steering
wheels when the Rapture comes meshed more with their philosophy of turning over
bad moral risks to the state for prosecution, and the moral hazard of the
Tribulation days be damned.
Now, after all this,
you might think I'd make it criminal to practice law or underwrite insurance policies,
as Mr. Terry Johnston, of California, and certain high Democratic mucky mucks
advocate. Tempting as that would be, it's not Catfish. But - as to them as cry
out for tort reform or insurance reform, my point is: "why not the
both?"
Oh... and them burglars,
suing those they rob for inj’ries suffered on the "job"? By all
means, give 'em all the free medical treatment they're entitled to... as in the
Eighth Amendment as applicable to that place in which they should be residing,
and for a good long time...
Jail.
|
CLICK the CATFISH to go to
PAST and PRESENT EPISODES of "BLACK HELICOPTERS" and to OTHER JACK PARNELL COLUMNS |